Point Of Care Testing for Pharmaceutical Development: Accelerating Drug Discovery

point of care testing devices

Until the recent development of point of care (POC) testing, most diagnostic tests were performed by collecting a sample directly from the site or source and sending the sample to a laboratory, where it would take days or weeks to obtain results.

Diagnostic testing in the medical industry has traditionally been conducted using a “centralized” approach for decades. This centralized approach implements the consolidation of diagnostics from numerous access points, involving the collection of samples that are sent to laboratories capable of performing complex, high-throughput sample processing and testing. Results are obtained and sent to the medical profession, and the process takes at least a few days on average.

The Development of POC Medical Devices

The need to obtain faster test results continues to grow. The medical industry, in particular, has developed portable POC medical testing devices that are relatively easy to use in various environments. The ever-changing landscape of sample testing continues to drive the evolution of faster methods to produce results and maintain testing accuracy and cost-effectiveness. Point-of-care devices are sought in the medical field, as well as in the agricultural, food and beverage, and numerous other industries.

What Is Point Of Care Testing?

In the past two decades, there has been a significant increase in the in vitro diagnostics (IVD) market, most notably in the point of care (POC) testing category. POC tests are diagnostic tests performed directly at the site or source. POC testing is best defined by where the testing is done, i.e., at a location outside the centralized laboratory, rather than by the kinds of testing that are performed.

There are many point-of-care testing methods used in the medical field, and they may be referred to by many different names, such as near-patient testing, remote testing, satellite testing, and rapid diagnostic testing. Contrary to the centralized diagnostic testing approach, point-of-care solutions provide a “decentralized” approach that enables decentralized access points, does not require an off-location laboratory to perform testing and provides much faster results that allow for immediate healthcare interaction.

What Are The Advantages Of Point-Of-Care Testing Equipment?

Generally, POC testing encompasses any tests conducted at or near the site or source where a sample is taken. In medical applications, a sample is taken from or near a patient and at the site where care or treatment is provided. POC lab test results are typically available relatively quickly (within minutes or a few hours), so any necessary action can be taken without delay, significantly reducing the time needed for medical decision-making. POC tests are largely molecular and/or antibody-based tests that utilize the specific detection of DNA markers or specific antigen and antibody interactions, which produce a result that is visible to the eye or detected by a small electronic instrument.

The devices used to obtain the results of a POC test come in an array of forms. One of the most common is basic dipsticks that operate using lateral flow technology. POC testing using lateral flow dipsticks may be able to detect proteins, antibodies and, in some instances, amplified DNA products. Lateral flow-based POC tests usually reveal results within a few minutes, and the results are determined “colorimetrically,” meaning that a color change is viewed visually. Lateral flow dipsticks have been incorporated into many over-the-counter medical-based POC tests, such as urinalysis tests and tests to detect the bacteria that cause strep throat.

Point-Of-Care Testing Examples Outside of Medical Applications

Although the early development of POC testing was largely based on meeting needs in the medical industry, there are many different point-of-care testing examples in other industries. Examples of these are the agricultural and food and beverage industries. The agricultural industry, in particular, needs diagnostic tests that can be performed in the field. Several plant diseases caused by bacteria and fungi require rapid, accurate detection and identification to prevent the spread of infection. Besides saving a significant amount of time by not having to send the sample to a laboratory and having to wait for results, an additional benefit of using point of care laboratory tests is that they can be done by farmers or growers themselves rather than investing additional time and money in having trained biological analytical professionals complete the tests.

 

Several molecular-based POC diagnostics tests may require small, usually inexpensive instruments to produce and visualize the test results. Molecular-based POC tests are often designed to detect the presence of a viral, bacterial, fungal or protozoan microorganism in a sample like a blood or saliva sample. These molecular based POC tests usually rely on the amplification of a target DNA marker that if detected, indicates the presence of an infectious microorganism and a positive result.

 

The technological methods that form the basis of POC testing continue to advance. More recently, the innovation of alternative nucleic acid (i.e. DNA and RNA) amplification techniques has provided a platform for the development of POC tests that can produce results very quickly without compromising the specificity and sensitivity of the assay, and deliver results with accuracy akin to that of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). In addition to obtaining accurate test results, another important criterion of a POC test is the speed at which it produces the results. These so-called “rapid” POC test kits are more available in the lateral flow assay dipstick form where they can be used successfully as more of a preliminary diagnosis. For more definite results, nucleic acid amplification has the ability to provide test results with a higher level of accuracy.

 

Isothermal nucleic acid amplification is a more recently developed technique for amplifying DNA and RNA without using expensive laboratory instruments and equipment. A number of isothermal nucleic acid amplification techniques have been successfully developed. One notable isothermal nucleic acid amplification technique is called “loop-mediated isothermal amplification” or LAMP. The advantage of designing a POC test using isothermal amplification technology is that it maximizes the important criteria of POC testing: convenience, speed, accuracy and cost-effectiveness. Many isothermal assays produce results within 30 to 40 minutes, and the results may be produced colorimetrically using a lateral flow assay, i.e., dipstick method, or by producing a change in color in the reaction tube to indicate a positive versus negative result.

Why Trust POC Testing Kits From Helix Biological Laboratories?

Helix Biological Laboratory has recently developed nucleic acid detection and identification assays using isothermal amplification technology to confirm the presence of specific microorganisms in various sample types, including food products, environmental water, agricultural samples and probiotic products. The goal of the development of these isothermal-based nucleic acid detection and identification assays is to incorporate them into diagnostic POC diagnostics kits that can be used on-site so that rapid, accurate results data can be obtained.

With the continued increasing demand for POC testing across a number of industries, Helix Biological Laboratory has the vision of being a laboratory that will be a leader in the POC diagnostic testing industry. With continued innovation of point-of-care devices, Helix Biological Laboratory is determined to bring forth new methods, products, services and solutions that have a significant positive impact and value. Through the transformation of creative concepts into tangible results, we believe that we will advance the efficiency and effectiveness of POC testing.

Tracing the Unseen: The Critical Role of Microbial Source Tracking in Safeguarding Water Quality

Despite having one of the safest drinking water supplies in the world and among the highest standards in recreational water hygiene, a large number of Americans become ill every year from diseases spread through water. In a recently published comprehensive study of waterborne diseases in the United States, the CDC showed that every year, diseases spread through water cause 7.15 million illnesses and 6,630 deaths, costing the healthcare system more than $3.3 billion. Let’s review some concerns regarding the waterborne disease challenges that are currently being faced and how microbial source tracking can help public health professionals mitigate waterborne disease threats.

 

Why is Water Contamination Testing Important?

An increasing number of waterborne illnesses are related to recreational water activities, with swimming being one of the primary sources of waterborne intestinal, respiratory, ear and skin infections. Water contamination testing can help identify potentially disease-causing bacteria, fungi, viruses and protozoans being found more frequently in pools, lakes, rivers and oceans. These pathogenic microorganisms can cause serious skin and gastrointestinal illnesses and, in rare cases, exposure to flesh-eating bacteria.

The Role of Fecal Source Tracking

Beaches are often unsafe for recreational use because of elevated fecal contamination from combined sewer overflows, leaking septic systems, contaminated beach sand, pets (particularly dogs), local wildlife, migrating birds, including geese, ducks and seagulls, or nearby agricultural practices.  Getting a clearer understanding of the sources of contamination is extremely important for resource managers in their effort to control and reduce the effects of fecal pollution or prevent contamination from entering the water in the first place. This would significantly decrease the risk of individuals being exposed to fecal pollution and minimize the community costs associated with closing and reopening beaches. Traditional techniques for examining contaminated water measure the amount of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in a sample. An FIB test will indicate conclusively if fecal matter is present in a waterway. However, a FIB test will not identify the source of the fecal contamination.

Fecal source tracking
Effective Microbial Water Testing Methods Several types of microbial water testing tools have been developed that enable researchers and water resource management to identify the sources of fecal pollution in water, which is critical for managing and remedying water quality. Among these tools, microbial source tracking or MST, is the most powerful tool for understanding the source of contamination and mitigating its effects or stopping it altogether. MST analyzes the genetic material present in fecal bacteria using host-associated quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR), which is able to measure fecal pollution levels and identify the host source of the pollution. The qPCR method produces millions of copies of a specific fecal bacterial host-associated target gene found in a contaminated water sample to determine if fecal contamination from a particular host source is present and at what level. 

Microbial Water Analysis Of Humans And Animal Sources

Humans and animals have digestive tracts with specific microbial communities. For example, certain bacteria found in the feces of humans may not be found in the feces of cows. The same holds true for the other animals that are commonly found to be large contributors to fecal contamination in waterways. These differences allow bacteria found in the digestive tract to be used as indicators of the host source of fecal contamination. Unique regions of DNA, referred to as DNA markers, can be established for certain bacteria in each potential host source. These DNA markers are used in qPCR microbial water analysis to selectively identify the source or sources of fecal contamination in a waterway.
Environmental Microbial Source Tracking

 

Tactical Microbial Testing Of WaterWhen performing MST analysis, water resource managers have a general protocol for sampling recreational water from a beach or lake suspected of having fecal contamination. Typically, microbial testing of water sampling locations is selected. Based on past sampling history or more recent activity, these locations are often potential ” hot spots” of fecal contamination. Materials, particularly sterile collection vessels, are obtained for collecting the water sample. A date is selected for sampling, usually based on weather factors, time of year, or following a particular event. After samples are collected, they are properly stored and sent to a laboratory for testing. 

Laboratory Microbial Water Analysis

In the laboratory, water samples are individually vacuum-filtered through a nitrocellulose membrane that captures any bacteria present in the water sample. DNA is then extracted from the membrane, and the extracted DNA is used in the qPCR analysis along with the specific DNA marker(s) that will identify each host source of fecal contamination in the water sample. Microbial analysis of water of a single water sample can be used to identify the presence of multiple MST DNA markers and provide an exact proportion of bacteria from each potential contaminant.  

Why Use Professional Microbial Source Tracking Laboratories?

 Helix Biological Laboratory has extensive laboratory services and experience performing microbial source tracking (MST) analysis to detect and identify the host sources of fecal contamination in recreational waters. We have designed and developed qPCR assays with the highest degree of specificity and sensitivity, allowing us to provide informative and accurate results to our clients. Knowing the host sources and locations of fecal contamination provides our clients with the information that they require so they can proceed to take the appropriate actions to decrease fecal contamination and improve water quality. Helix Biological Laboratory has an extensive library of DNA markers for identifying host sources of fecal contamination. These host source DNA markers include the following: 

  • Human
  • Cow (bovine)
  • Pig
  • Horse (equine)
  • Dog (canine)
  • Deer (elk)
  • Gull
  • Geese
  • Duck
  • Chicken/Turkey
  • Ruminant animals
  • Avian
  • Beaver

 Contact Helix Biological Laboratory today for microbial source tracking services and let us assist you in detecting and identifying host sources of fecal contamination and provide the information and data you need to improve water quality along ocean beaches, lakes, rivers, streams, estuaries, and watersheds! [vc_row full_width=”stretch_row” full_height=”yes” equal_height=”yes” parallax=”content-moving” parallax_image=”119″ css=”.vc_custom_1631313512663{background-image: url(https://glj.dvf.mybluehost.me/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/laboratory-with-microscope-1.jpg?id=119) !important;}”][vc_column width=”1/2″ css=”.vc_custom_1631310682853{padding-top: 0px !important;padding-bottom: 0px !important;background-color: #ffffff !important;}”][vc_custom_heading text=”Have Questions? Contact Us.” font_container=”tag:h4|text_align:left” google_fonts=”font_family:Tinos%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700%2C700italic|font_style:400%20regular%3A400%3Anormal” css_animation=”none” css=”.vc_custom_1631310732514{margin-top: 25px !important;margin-bottom: 25px !important;border-radius: 4px !important;}”][gravityform id=”1″ title=”false” description=”false” ajax=”false”][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/2″][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Navigating the Risks: Understanding Biological Hazards in Our Food Supply

The CDC estimates that each year, on average, foodborne illness affects 48 million people, resulting in an estimated 128,000 hospitalizations and 3,000 deaths. At least $95.2 billion per year is lost in low and middle-income countries in treating foodborne diseases and economic losses that are caused by biological hazards.

Most foodborne illnesses reported are caused by one major type of food safety hazard, which is referred to as biological hazards. Examples of biological hazards in food include bacteria, fungi, viruses, protozoans and other microscopic parasites. These microscopic organisms enter the intestinal tract by ingesting contaminated food, water, or other beverages and cause various illnesses, some of which become life-threatening.

What Is An Example Of A Biological Hazard From Food Handlers?

Food Microbiology Testing

Biological food hazards are invisible, making them extremely difficult to detect and remove from a food processing facility. Another factor leading to biological hazards being so dangerous is that they may enter the processing and distribution of food at any point in the chain. One example of biological hazards in food include viruses and bacteria carried on the hands and skin of handlers, which can introduce those microorganisms into food products, particularly ready-to-eat foods like lunch meats. Bacterial pathogens from raw ingredients can contaminate poultry products. In the agricultural industry, many fruits and vegetables may be contaminated by bacteria, fungi, parasites and viruses in the soil or through contaminated irrigation systems or water systems in processing plants. Yeast and molds can also contaminate fresh fruits and vegetables that have been improperly stored or handled. Simple food handling practices, such as proper hand washing, proper environmental hygiene, and strict monitoring of food handling protocols and conditions, significantly contribute to controlling biological hazards and reducing cases of foodborne illness.

There are a significant number of food microbiology hazards recognized in the food industry. Some foodborne illnesses include watery diarrhea and abdominal cramps, while others are known to cause severe health problems. Whatever the degree of risk that a biological hazard may have, all biological hazards prefer to grow in moist and nutritious environments. This is the main reason that makes food products their number one target.

Examples Of Biological Hazards

Food Biological Hazards

Bacteria

Bacteria are the primary type of biological hazards that every food handler must be aware of. The types of foodborne bacteria vary greatly. The most commonly occurring bacterial biological hazards include Salmonella, Campylobacter, E. coli O157:H7, Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Bacillus cereus and Clostridium perfringens. Some foodborne bacteria can survive extreme conditions, whereas others can be easily eliminated and have minimal threats to human health. However, certain bacteria can stay inactive for long periods of time in the form of spores and multiply when the conditions are favorable again. This mechanism makes spore-forming bacteria species a significant concern in food preparation.

Fungi

Fungi are a type of biological organism that includes both yeasts and molds.

Microscopic fungi can survive in very acidic and dry conditions. Their ability to withstand these conditions makes them a significant concern for intermediate moisture foods and preserved products. Many species of fungi produce toxins. In addition to causing potentially serious illness if consumed, these toxins are difficult to remove once they have contaminated food. In these instances, prevention is a better approach to protecting consumers. Some of the most common foodborne fungi include Aspergillus species and Candida species.

Parasites

Parasites are microorganisms that require another living thing (a host) to get the nutrients they need to survive. Parasites can live in moist foods and transfer to humans, where they can cause foodborne illness. According to the CDC, Trichinella and Cryptosporidium are the most common foodborne parasites.

Viruses

Viruses are also a biological hazard that is a source of contamination in foods. Several viruses are involved in foodborne illness, with the most common being noroviruses and the hepatitis A virus. Noroviruses are one of the most significant biological hazards responsible for causing foodborne illness in the United States.

The Science Behind Food Safety: Microbiology Lab Testing

Microbiology lab testing and identifying microorganisms that contaminate consumable products and can lead to foodborne illness is a high priority in the food and beverage industry. When a contamination issue arises, it is essential to detect and identify the type of contaminating microorganism and determine its source. How quickly this information is acquired is also a vital factor. Traditional microbiological plate culturing methods using selective nutrient media are often used in many microbiological testing labs. Microbiological plate culturing frequently requires relatively long time frames to culture bacteria and fungi, and it can be limited in identifying to the species level. In addition, the microbiological plate culturing methods used to culture bacteria and fungi cannot be used to culture viruses and protozoans as these organisms require specialized host cell culturing, which is more expensive, time-consuming and technical.

The Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) has become the gold standard in detecting and identifying contaminating foodborne microorganisms. 

  • PCR has greater specificity and sensitivity than plate culturing methods.
  • Because PCR is a rapid method, it can provide results in a fraction of the time.
  • PCR can also be coupled with DNA sequencing to obtain the DNA sequence from a target foodborne microorganism to ensure 100% identification using search and matching to DNA databases.
  • PCR is relatively cost-effective and is the method of choice for rapidly detecting and identifying foodborne microorganisms.
  • PCR and DNA sequencing technologies offer unparalleled insights into foodborne pathogens’ genotype, diversity, and activities with their potential for pathogen surveillance, tracing, screening and identification.

Maintaining food safety from biological hazards requires preventive controls and strict monitoring. These approaches are instrumental in the early detection and management of foodborne outbreaks, thereby enhancing public safety and health and limiting or preventing economic loss to food businesses. However, when an issue with microorganism contamination occurs, Helix Biological Laboratory can assist our clients facing this problem. Our advanced food microbiology lab methods and extensive experience with PCR-based assays allow us to perform testing and analysis to detect and identify contaminating microorganisms in various food, beverage and agricultural products. Contact us today to learn more about our microbiology testing lab testing services!

 

[vc_row full_width=”stretch_row” full_height=”yes” equal_height=”yes” parallax=”content-moving” parallax_image=”119″ css=”.vc_custom_1631313512663{background-image: url(https://glj.dvf.mybluehost.me/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/laboratory-with-microscope-1.jpg?id=119) !important;}”][vc_column width=”1/2″ css=”.vc_custom_1631310682853{padding-top: 0px !important;padding-bottom: 0px !important;background-color: #ffffff !important;}”][vc_custom_heading text=”Have Questions? Contact Us.” font_container=”tag:h4|text_align:left” google_fonts=”font_family:Tinos%3Aregular%2Citalic%2C700%2C700italic|font_style:400%20regular%3A400%3Anormal” css_animation=”none” css=”.vc_custom_1631310732514{margin-top: 25px !important;margin-bottom: 25px !important;border-radius: 4px !important;}”][gravityform id=”1″ title=”false” description=”false” ajax=”false”][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/2″][/vc_column][/vc_row]